About (د مرګ د ویرې علاج): You can read short details of the book above. If You want to get the book (د مرګ د ویرې علاج) Road Alignment and Survey), than just click on DOWNLOAD FREE Bottom, wait and the download will start to your Mobile/PC.
In Sahih Muslim, Imam Nawi quotes this saying of Imam Ibn Salah, and he compares it with him and says: And he claimed that he did not correct the hadeeth of Mujiba on the authority of Abu Amir or Abu Malik al-Ash’ari on the authority of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace. Qal Hisham bin Ammar did not base it, it is disconnected between Al-Bukhari and Hasham. This is a mistake from Ibn Hazm from two reasons: one of them is that there is no interruption in this matter, on the one hand, Al-Bukhari met with Hishama and heard it from him, and we have decided in our book on the sciences of hadith that if the meeting and the hearing are carried out with the safety of al-Tadlis, the pregnancy will be narrated from him upon hearing it with whatever word it was. As the Companions say, the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, is on hearing from me if he does not appear to be a khilafa… The second is that this hadeeth is a well-known hadith that is clearly related word for word, except by the authority of Al-Bukhari. The third is that if it is an interruption, like that in the two books, it is not connected to the interruption of al-Qadih, because it is known from their habits and conditions, and it is mentioned in the book, especially for the correct mention, then it will not be accepted in it. Named in the book. Ibn Hajar says in Fath al-Bari: “If I said: Ibn Hazm said: This hadeeth is disconnected between Al-Bukhari and Sadaqah Ibn Khalid, and the disconnected does not constitute a Hajj.” I said: I believe Ibn Hazm in this, but al-Bukhari said: Hisham bin Ammar said: Hadithna Sadaqah, and he did not say: Sadaqah Ibn Khalid said. And the information in Ibn Hajar’s Taghliq al-Taliq, but we wrote it together with the translation above.
According to Sheikh Qaradawi’s words and my research, the main point of the argument of the proponents of music is the absence of reason. But above, the proofs of the authenticity of the hadith were presented, so, therefore, the real abahat was tied to it. Apart from this, their strongest argument – which Sheikh Qaradawi has also pointed to – is the unanimous hadith of Umm al-Mu’minin Aisha, may God be pleased with her: The Ansar Taghniyan Bama Taqawalt The Ansar on the day of Ba’ath, she said: “Walista Bamghanitin.” Abu Bakr said: “Satan’s hymns are in the house of the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, and that is on the day of Eid.” Edna” but the argument is weak for this reason:
The first is that: Abu Bakr, may God be pleased with him, became angry and called the song of those junkies the song of Satan. If Abu Bakr did not know the condemnation of this work, then he would never have mentioned it.
The second is that: The Messenger of God did not blame Abu Bakr and did not tell him that this action was not bad, rather he told him that it was Eid al-Fitr. That is, this is an exceptional situation and not the real one. That is, if it was Dakhtar’s version, then he would not have allowed this work, and he would have remained in his original order.